Saturday, July 27, 2013

Sexual Addiction

You know I was just reading that having a sex addiction is no longer consider a disorder, rather on the spectrum range of normal behavior. Glad to know I am normal, but that aside I got to wondering as to why they would decide to call this a normal behavior and at the same time nave the new psychiatric manual of mental disorders greatly expanding what they call mental illness, even grieving soon after a loved one's death can now be considered major depression.

Looking for an explanation it occurred to me that homosexual behavior may be the reason for the changing sexual addiction from a disorder to normal behavior. As a whole the homosexual population, married or other wise, seek out sex with strangers at a much greater rate then do straight. One study in San Francisco showed that 43 percent of male homosexuals had had more than 500 sexual partners. Seventy-nine percent of their sexual partners were strangers. Only 3 percent had had fewer than ten sexual partners. Lesbians, in contrast, are less promiscuous than male homosexuals but more promiscuous than heterosexual women: One large study found that 42 percent of lesbians had more than ten sexual partners. A substantial percentage of them were strangers.

So then could it be that the reason for the change of heart about sexual addition is a further move to make those who chose a homosexual life appear normal and not a bunch of sick wackos?


Thursday, July 25, 2013

Speaking of Heat

Speaking of heat, I was reading here a while back that the the Warming Alarmist are saying that the increasing heat caused by CO2 has not abated rather, they say, it has been moving down deeper in the oceans. Well they had to come up with something to explain why all of their computer models have a one to one correlation with the projected rise in heat to the rise in the amount of CO2 in the air. Well, as you know, this correlation stopped some years ago, the CO2 has continued to grow just as fast as before but the heat climbing has stopped. Somehow they say the heat is stored down deep and will come back to make us just as hot as they have been saying along. The Long Pause just got three months longer. Last month, the RSS monthly global mean lower-troposphere temperature anomalies showed no global warming for exactly 204 months – the first dataset to show the full 17 years without warming specified by Santer as demonstrating that the models are in fundamental error.  Link

Putting aside the fact that the warming is caused by natural cycles that has nothing to do with the CO2 that we are putting in the air, let me explain just what heat it. At absolute zero there is no heat because all molecules' movement has ceased. How as molecules start to move the heat starts to rise regardless of the cause of that motion. Now imagine a large pot of water with a heat element not under the pot but just on the surface, and a rheostat to control the heat put into the water, remember the earth's surface is over 70% water.

When you run a current through an element, or when sunshine lands upon matter, its molecules get aggregated and starts to move faster, that is it starts to get hot. The water molecules near the element get excited by the element's (the sun) and starts to move faster too. The water at the bottom of the pot is not affected by the movement of the molecules because as the moving molecules at the surface bump up against the slower molecules beneath them and are slowed down so at a given level of excitation at the surface of the pot will only increase the water's heat (temperature) so deep into the pot before the molecular movement is buffered to the same level as the water deeper in the pot. The heat is not stored in a such a manner that it can be retrieved for later use entropy sees to that, heat is kinetic energy (heat is kinetic in that it is motion that generates it), and once the movement that causes it stops it cannot be restored without a further energy source, that is why the temperature drops at night unless a front of warm air move in.  You can observe the effect of slow moving molecules (cold) slowing down fast moving molecules (hot) every time you put ice into your drink to cool it down.  

With kinetic energy the faster the movement the greater the heat, this is why rubbing your hands together on a cold day warms them up and why when you stop rubbing the warming stops too. The air is full of slow moving molecules that slow down the molecules in your hands making them feel cold, you can expend the energy rubbing your hands and warm them as long as you keep rubbing, but you cannot keep this heat in your hand when you stop the rubbing (unless you put your gloves back on) for slower moving molecules in the air will slow the faster moving molecules in your hands as the faster ones collide with the slower ones, just like the moving molecules at the bottom of the pot will slow the faster moving molecules at the surface of the pot (oceans).

So then what happens if the energy source at the surface is increased by whatever means? The point at which the colder water deep in the pot goes a little deeper in the pot, but the water at the bottom of the pot is still unaffected. Heat put into the oceans' deep can never come back up to warm the earth above unless somehow the ocean deep water is made to be hotter that the surface of the earth.  The only way the excess heat, if it exists, caused by the increase of co2 and captured in the ocean's heat sink could grow to the level of affection the surface temperature would be for the ocean's depths to get as warm as the surface and not allow any  dampening of the faster moving molecules at the surface.


I know that holding two Bachelor and a Master of Science Degrees does not make me a scientist, but it has given me the education to understand what they are trying to tell me, and the ability to analyze the logic they are using and to compare it to the real world.  Now let us return to the model I described at the beginning of the essay, a large pot of water with a heat element not under the pot but just on the surface, and a rheostat to control the heat inputed into the water.  If the current in the element is increased, the heat on the water's surface will also increase  and lowered the point in the pot at which the cold at the bottom of the pot stops the water from getting any warmer. When you are cooking you know that if you put a lid on the pot that the water will get hot faster, but unless you turn the heat high enough it still will not boil water.  The alarmist as claiming that co2 is acting like a lid on the pot causing the world to get worming, and just as some lids have vent to allow the heat to escape the pot, and our increasing the amount of co2 in the air is shutting off the vent that allows the earth to shed its excess heat into space.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Skipping Breakfast Kills You?

If you haven't heard yet you will soon about a A study of older men found those who regularly skipped breakfast had a 27 percent higher risk of a heart attack than those who ate a morning meal. Sound scary for all you non breakfast eaters doesn't it?

The researchers surveyed nearly 27,000 men about their eating habits in 1992. About 13 percent of them said they regularly skipped breakfast. They were all educated health professionals — like dentists and veterinarians — and were at least 45. Over the next 16 years, 1,527 suffered fatal or non-fatal heart attacks, including 171 who had said they regularly skipped breakfast. In other words, over 7 percent of the men who skipped breakfast had heart attacks, compared to nearly 6 percent of those who ate breakfast”. There was no indications that the ones who said that in 1992 whey regularly skipped breakfast continued to skip breakfast for the rest of their lives, only that 22 years ago they said that they did.

Now the difference between 6 and 7% reads like a one percent differences to me, The researchers calculated the increased risk at 27 percent, taking into account other factors like smoking, drinking, diet and health problems like high blood pressure and obesity. I was unable to find the actual study to see how they did that calculations, but it seems to me that there is more room for a correlation than a causation.

We don’t know whether it’s the timing or content of breakfast that’s important. It’s probably both,” said Andrew Odegaard, a University of Minnesota researcher who has studied a link between skipping breakfast and health problems such as obesity and high blood pressure. Generally, people who eat breakfast tend to eat a healthier diet,”.

This comes close but does not tell you that the non breakfast eaters shared all the risk that the breakfast eater incurred, that should imply that 5 of those 6 percent occured for the same reason that the breakfast eaters leaving the one percent difference.  Here they made a big assumption and that was because the one differ and that they had recorded was if they reported 22 years ago if they ate or skipped breakfast that skipping breakfast was correlated to the increased heart attack rate, how that related to the difference is unexplained and, in my opinion, explainable.

Personal I skip breakfast ever since I stopped working for a living, as I no longer need the calories I did in those days, but I tend to eat healthy food (still trying to figure out how you eat a diet) though only twice a day and seldom snack. It seems to me that obesity and high blood pressure is much more the likely cause of the increase rate of the heart attacks in the non-breakfast eaters instead of their skipping breakfast.  I just wonder who it is that is trying to get me to eat breakfast? 








Monday, July 22, 2013

The Soviet Story

The Soviet Story (2008) Documentary


Published on Apr 5, 2013
The Soviet Union helped Nazi Germany instigate the Holocaust. The film shows recently uncovered archive documents revealing this. Interviews with former Soviet Military intelligence officers unveil shocking details.

"The Soviet Story" is a story of an Allied power, which helped the Nazis to fight Jews and which slaughtered its own people on an industrial scale. Assisted by the West, this power triumphed on May 9th, 1945. Its crimes were made taboo, and the complete story of Europe's most murderous regime has never been told. Until now...


Saturday, July 20, 2013

Obama Said He Might Have Been Trayvon


Obama asked that we consider that if Martin had had a gun the night George shot him would he have been justified in shooting George because George frighten him. The answer is easy, not until and unless George had put him in reasonable fear of his death or great bodily harm. Then and only then would Martin be justified in shooting George, and to have someone following you does not justify that fear.

He also, as have other, asked did bot Martin have the right to stand his ground? Sure, if George had been walking very slow through his neighborhood in a driving rain and after asking George what he was doing there, and George commence to beat the hell out of him then he would sure have the right to shoot George to save his life.

A lot has been made of Martin having a right to walk through George's neighborhood. No argument, he did, I have read of no trespass violations. Conversely George had a right to be suspicious of his behavior, e.g., taking a slow walk in the driving rain, cutting between apartments, looking through windows. This is why George called the police, because of suspicious actions.


You can argue whether it was wise or not for George to follow Martin, but in doing so he broke no law, not even when the dispatch told him that they did need for him to do that. Then the Dispatch asked for an address and George went to look for according to testimony. Some take this as disingenuous on George's part, his own neighborhood and he did not know the name of the street. To this I can speak of first hand, I do not know the name of the second street north of my house. I know people who live on it, and drive on it often, but I do not know its name. Also I have been out looking for an address and have asked people who had no idea that the street was just a block over.

Now the issue has morphed into a drive to end the so called Stand Your Ground laws in all the stated that have enacted them. Stand you ground is a euphemism for having no duty to retreat and a reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm justify the use of lethal force without having to show that you did everything in your power to get away from your aggressor before you used that lethal force. In my opinion this is another example of never letting good crisis go to wast even if you have to create it. George did not use the Stand Your Ground law a defense, it was not brought up in the trial. After the trial one off the juries mentioned it in an interview on CNN, and the Progressives have grabbed it and ran with it. No Black child is safe as long as there are Stand Your Ground laws in any state.


Which leads me to my last point in this post, Martin as a child. He was 17 years old, not a child in anyone's eyes other than a mother. The day I turned 17 I enlisted with the United Stated Marines Corps, and I assure you that they did not treat me as a child. They gave me gun, strike that, a rifle and thought me how to use it, and in that same year I was helping impose the blockade of Cuba sailing around Cat Island on the USS Boxer fully expecting that we were going to invade Cuba. Half of the Marines on the ship were 17 and 18 year olds. Child, I don't think so. and I assure you that we has stormed the beaches Castro's army would not have mistaken us as children.

Monday, July 8, 2013

History Of The New World Order, Let’s Start With Congressional Record of 1940

In searching for historic documents related to the New World
Order I came across this collection that I had never seen before.
For those of you who believe this New World Order talk is
 something new,  here are some docs you may want to review.

This clearly shows that the elite have had a plan in place for
well over 50 years.

Their plan was to erode national sovereignty piece by piece,
until the citizens of this country willingly hand over their
 sovereignty to this One World Government, New World
 Order.

They state that new enemies need to be identified, would
this be  the “war on terror”? Is that one of our new enemies
 that we need bigger government to protect us from?

How about this, in searching for a common enemy against
whom we can unite, they came up with pollution, the threat
of global warming, water shortages, and famine, would fit the
bill.

It’s all here; they have time on their side. Here is their long term
plan that they have been implementing for years and years. We
 Shall start with the Congressional Record of 1940, entered on

 Monday, August 19th. The information speaks for itself.

In the April 1974 issue of the Council on Foreign Relations journal, “Foreign Affairs”, Richard N. Gardner wrote a section of this issue entitled, “The Hard Road To World Order” (pp. 556-576). He goes on to state that the house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up, among much more.. The following scans are from a University Library:

Now, I’ll jump back to the 1940 Congressional Record…
In addition, there’s a famous quote online from James Warburg on February 17, 1950:
On February 17, 1950, CFR member James Warburg (banker, and architect of the Federal Reserve System) stated before a Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “We shall have one world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” Again, the media remained silent.

Taking a step back, let’s look at the first publication of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1922.
From here, I’ll shift focus to the famous “Club Of Rome”, who’s members include Al Gore, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Henry Kissinger, Tony Blair, George Soros, and many more.. These are some excerpts from their 1992 report entitled “The First Global Revolution”…

The following is an article located in the FBI Vault file From 1970, discussing The Council On Foreign Relations & Agenda: 
Interestingly enough, this FBI vault section on the CFR has 222 pages of documents, most of which are letters from concerned people and as far back as 1950. I think J. Edgar Hoover must have spent crazy amounts of time responding to all these, and I would guess that he only took the time to respond to a few!

The following is from the 1953 California Legislature’s Eleventh Report: Senate Investigating Committee On Education… 


Finally, I’ll wrap this up with the issue surrounding the late Congressman .

“Many of you have seen a recent thread on the late Congressman in an airing of Crossfire from 1983, where he openly discusses the elitist group and much more (and subsequently “died” months later). If you listen closely, he mentions “The Schlesinger Manifesto”, a slang term given to an article appearing in the 1947 May-June issue of The Partisan Review. The article was written by Arthur Schlesinger, a professor and historian who later became “high in the councils” of the Kennedy Administration. This article was inserted into the U.S. Congressional Record 14 years later in 1961.”
First, the broadcast:





Now, the document he mentioned: The Schlesinger Manifesto…


And, for those of you who are still with me, Well done and I hope this information is helpful.
Report abuse