Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Donald Sterling Shunning

"SACRAMENTO (CBS13/AP) — Black lawmakers at the California state Capitol are calling on fans to boycott Los Angeles Clippers games after alleged recordings emerged of owner Donald Sterling making racist remarks. Sterling is purported to have told a woman not to bring black people to his games or associate with them."

I have to observation to make on this:

The first is the ridicules use of "alleged" and "is purported". The tape of his remarks are being play over every MSM outlet available, there is no allegations or purporting about it, they are facts.

The second is two fold, first is the PC use of shunning those who offend their sensibilities, e.g., boycott. Then there is the God given right of a person to like or dislike any person may may wish for any reason they may wish. Sterling broke no laws, he expressed an opinion and a rather. It was that that he would rather not have that is causing all the uproar. It was his right of association that he was exercising, as having the right to associate imply the right to disassociate.

They just don't like who he does not wish to hang out with or be associated with, for if that happens to be black people it is taboo. I believe that people have the right to like or dislike for any reason they may wish, and we do not have to like that reason for it to be a valid reason for them.

Yes people have the God given right to be racist, both white and black people have that right, and many exercise it. People also have the right to use shunning and shaming to attempt to change other's behavior, and to punish the wrong doers (in their eyes), it is when the government with all of its coercive powers get involved in the punishment of the offender for "though crime" that we should stand up for the offender's right to offend, especially when the offence broke no law nor did any harm other than to some's sensibilities

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Origins of Political Correctness And Cliven Bundy


Instead of my normal editorial morning comment today I am posting this video of Bill Whittle explaining the Frankfurt Fabian's success in projecting Political Correctness as a means to brainwash and instill what they believe will "Fundamentally Change" American into the Great Society that they envision for us.

As you listen to him explain how they pick and choose the narrative the MSM will project as important think of Cliven Bundy. Why? Because they desperately want to change the narrative from one of a rancher fight the mammon demands of the BLM, thus they have seized upon his remarks about slaves to change the focus from his fight with the expanding demands with the BLM has used to run all the other ranchers in his county out of the ranching business into one of a Black hatting Mormon who deserves no sympathy regardless of the justness of his cause.


This is not about racism any more than the land grab was about turtles or grazing fees. This, imo, is the implementation of UN's Agenda 21 to move the people off of the land and into cities. Thus the unification of a broad electorate, behind Cliven Bundy resistance is a risk that must be "nipped in the bud", to use Deputy Barney Fife's words.


Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Exciting Times

"A February 1933 fire that burned the Reichstag building was blamed on a Communist. The incident was used by the Nazis to crack down on Communists in Germany. The "Enabling Act" of March 1933, passed by the Reichstag, gave Hitler legal dictatorial power for four years."  This fire was a false flag operation set by the Nazi party (Read Boston Bombing, Sandy Hook, etc.).  Hitler then compelled all of his armed forces to swear an oath of loyalty to him personally. A plebiscite was then held for the public to decide on whether they approved of the changes already made, 90 percent of voters gave their approval. Thus Hitler had become führer and Reich Chancellor, and the title of president was abolished by a majority vote.

Obama is in the midst of purging the military, Retired Army Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin, who was with Delta Force and later Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence under President George W. Bush, says it is worrying that four-star generals are being retired at the rate that has occurred under Obama. “Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause,”


Even more worrisome is that there are well over seventy different non-Department of Defense federal agencies’ have armed divisions, all of them with arrest powers over American citizens, who, like the BLM, will gladly do Obama’s bidding up to and including killing you or your cattle, dogs, kids, brother, and sister.  “Department of Justice (DoJ) report cited a full 73 federal agencies who employ full-time armed officers.”  And, you have to ask yourself, why are they buying so much ammo?  What is the end game?

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Captain American And Government Hit List

I just read, 4/16/14, Ron Paul's nonprofit Campaign for Liberty will fight the Internal Revenue Service's demand that it reveal its donor list to the agency, despite having already been fined for refusing to do so.  Ron Paulgroup to defy IRS

This brought to mind several things:


Have you had the occasion to see the new Captain American movie: The Winter Soldier?  Well, in the story  S.H.I.E.L.D. (Read Homeland Security) had been infiltrated by a nefarious group called Hydry (read Fabian Progressives).  Hydra’s overwhelming desire is to bring peace and order to the world with a one world government with no dissenters to the type of rule they wished to impose upon the world.  Their plan was three fold:

First to infiltrate and take over Homeland Security, after the takeover to build serpentisuly a fleet of airships (reads Drones) that were heavily armed with extremely accurate long range guns that could target individual from high in the sky, and were nuclear powered so they never had to land, they would be resupplied by planes with ammunition and food.

Second was to obtain a list and location of all the people world wide who oppose and act against their taking over of the world and imposing the ridiged class division that their idea of order demanded.

Third was the implantation of their assume world dominance by killing Captain American (read, We The People) and all those in Homeland Security who had not been recruited to Hydra because they were believed to be incorruptible by the rewards Hydra offered.  And when they were out of the way to launch the airships, train their guns on all of those they felt would not go along with their takeover, about half a billion in all, and kill them all. 

The movie ends on a high note with Captain America, We The People, foiled the Hydra’s operation by changing the targeting data of the airships from the dissenters to the airships (Drones) themselves.

Which brings me to the IRS and Ron Paul’s list of donors.  Our government, like Santa Clause,  is composing a list of everyone naughty and nice for the day when SHTF.
Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. As you can see, this list covers most of the country

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation areseparate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. “Anti-Gay”
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Rightwing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians

Think it is a pipe dream?  Do you think that those who went to the Bundy Ranch in Nevada to stop the BLM are not on a list?  Do you think that you are not?  I have no doubt that I am on one.


Thursday, April 3, 2014

4/3/2014

Good morning, as you know by now, another shooting at Fort Hood. This time, it appears, not by a jihadist, but by a mental case. Now we do not know if he went on his shooting spree because he was depressed and just went crazy. Here one thing I doubt that they will yell you, and that is what psychotic drugs he was taking, and point out how many mass shooting shooters have been using them under doctor's orders. And as sure as the rain will fall the Progressives will use this as an excuses to limit all combat troops' legal liability to keep and bare arms.

May the Lord God IAUA bless us with enough this day.

But before I end my morning salutation I would like to say a word about the need for voter ID, and why Progressives are so dead set against it, they cannot win with out cheating. I read yesterday, "N.C. State Board Finds More than 35K Incidents of ‘Double Voting’ in 2012."

"North Carolina’s Board of Elections found that tens of thousands of registered voters from the state have personal information matching that of registered voters in other states, and appear to have voted in states other than North Carolina in 2012. In some cases, votes were cast under names of individuals who had passed away before Election Day. The review searched databases in 27 other states and 101 million voter records for information such as matching names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers." The Corner