Sunday, December 29, 2013

BLACK TEENAGE FLASH MOB PLAYS 'KNOCKOUT' GAME, CAUSES MAYHEM AT BROOKLYN MALL

Another battle front in the war on blacks against whites

TEENAGE FLASH MOB PLAYS 'KNOCKOUT' GAME, CAUSES MAYHEM AT BROOKLYN MALL

"According to the New York Post, the "wild flash mob" of "crazed teens" stole and smashed merchandise and beat up security guards at Kings Plaza Shopping Center between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. The teens reportedly used social media to "plan the mass looting" and may have thought the rapper Fabulous would be performing at the mall. They then bragged about their thuggery, some of which was caught on video and distributed via social media. One person wrote, “Teens rioting at Kings Plaza. They just shut the mall DOWN... Rowdy teens fighting and running through out the mall. It was crazy!!!” There were reportedly no arrests."

You would not know it from the report but all of the "crazed teens" were black thugs, and the one that got the knockout were white. I would advise all the shoppers in New York to go armed, but New York will not let them carry!

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Infiltration and Domination Surreptitious‎ly

There is nothing taking place in America today that cannot be understood by this examining the past 100-year of efforts to destroy America from within.  This is a documentary video that takes an in-depth look at the root of our decline in America. Socialism is just an intermendem step with the ultimate goal of global communism control. This documentary also lays out names and dates and groups that have an active and growing agenda to bring America down, from Karl Marx to the Fabian Socialists to the Weather Underground to President Barack Obama.

It also chronicles the methods they have used to implement their agenda, the source of those methods and how they are playing out in our society today.  This video takes a look at all of the typical leftist/liberal/progressive pet causes and explains how they came to be and how they tie into the socialist/communist agenda.  It was Karl Marx himself, unquestionably the father of modern Communism, who said: “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” —Karl Marx


Just why is Dethroning God and Capitalism so important to the Left and socialist/communist leaders?


Friday, December 27, 2013

Twitter Apologized

On Tuesday, Twitter apologized for "mistakenly" blocking the iStandWithPhil.com website.  “The URL IStandWithPhil.com was mistakenly flagged as spam tonight, by an outside organization that tracks spam sources. We have restored access and apologize for the error,” Twitter told Marketing Land on Tuesday.

“Twitter generally does not act to block content until receiving a report from another user or group of users, that complaint is then reviewed by Twitter, who decides whether to take action or not. Normally, the blocked account holder receives an email notifying them of the action being taken.”

I believe Twitter about this, this is a favorite tactic of the Progressives on Facebook as well.  They search for post and pages that run counter to their agenda and report them as either spam or offensive.  Leaving it to the owner of the page or author of the post to straighten it out with Facebook.  The ones who flag the page, comment, or link gets to stay anonymous and suffer no consequences for their sabotage.

Facebook and Twitter both should keep track of people who flag things as spam or offensive, and if they are found to have been complaining to further an agenda their accounts should be closed.  I know that they will just go an open another account, but if they bar the IP address from opening an account it would make them have some consequences for their guerilla warfare sabotage tactics.



Thursday, December 26, 2013

Counter arguments to: How to ruin Christmas: A holiday guide to arguing with conservative relatives

WEDNESDAY, DEC 25, 2013 07:45 AM EST

Holiday rule #1: Never, ever argue politics. But if you must, here’s how to beat your right-wing relatives

Go here for the original article at Salon.
While I am not a conservative on the political slidebar without a doubt I am to the right of Pareene.  I will be inserting my comment, counter arguments if you will, in red.
Happy holidays, fellow soldiers in the War on Christmas. It is the time of year when many Americans are expected to spend some time with people they are related to. Maybe some of the people you are related to listen to talk radio or read Twitchy[I only time I lessen to talk radio is when I am driving from here to thar, to and fro, and I have never heard of Twitchy until today.  That aside, what he in implying here is that conservative do not think for themselves, and without talk radio they would have no opinions about anything.]  That doesn’t have to be a problem — as always, the first rule of arguing politics over the holidays is never ever do it ever — [now this is pure  bullshit, the Progressives go out to pick a fight ever chance they get, consider the hype about talking about talking about signing up for ObomaCare over the weekend to make my point] but if some things come up, and you want to have your say, perhaps you need some help countering the easily digestible sound bytes of the conservative media machine. Here is a guide.
It has only been a few weeks since the last holiday argument guide[These guides are nought but talking points they wanttheir fellow travelers talking about] but in those weeks the right has moved on from criticizing the nationwide launch of a complex series of health insurance tomarkets … complaining about the persecution of a homophobic [homophobic is the label they put on anyone who disagrees with their agenda to make being queer as normal as being strait] television character and making fun of a stock photo model. So let’s move on with them, I guess.
The Duck guys have been silenced by liberal fascism
Well, let’s just get this bit out of the way: No, the First Amendment does not apply to private corporations [they got this right, the 1st Amendment only applies to government actors], like A&E Networks. The “Duck Dynasty” guy has a contract with a corporation that allows them to suspend or fire him if they feel like it. That’s how private contracts work, and private contracts are what modern capitalism is built on. A&E felt that the best thing they could do from a business perspective issuspend the duck guy after he said a bunch of offensive things. Sorry, if that makes you mad, you are mad at the free market, not liberals.  [To start with there has not been a free market it in America in over a hundred years, thanks to the Progressive law enacted such as the creation of the FEDs, EPA regulations, (I know Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), but it was in response to the lies told by Rachel Carson about DDT in "Silent Spring,"), but I regress, as much as A&E has the right to fire anyone who does not fulfill their terms of employment, the audience has a 1st Amendment right to express their displeasure, and to boycott if they so desire.  And it was a progressive who set this whole ball of wax into motion.  Scott Gurney the Duck Dynasty’ creator who sent Phill over to GM for that interview.  He played a “gay-for-pay” meth addict who acts in erotic videos “The Fluffer” .  
How I do not know for sure but I reckon that Gurney, know how Phill would answer, let him go into the lion's den, hoping that he would end up with everyone laughing at his backwards opinions about queers.
Maybe you think Phil Robertson’s remarks — essentially that butts are gross — are in fact a brave statement of an endangered point of view. They sort of are! But much of America has decided that that particular point of view deserves to become an anachronism, and they did not come to that conclusion because the liberal media has silenced those who argue that butts are gross. In fact it is quite easy to hear variations on that sentiment, from prominent political and media figures who are under no threat of being silenced. But the message just isn’t resonating anymore, because it’s stupid.
It is resounding with a lot more people than Pareene wants to admit to. Considing the percentages of the following groups thinking that gay sex is always wrong:
54% of those born in the 1940-1950 period, 65% of those from the East South Central region of the country, 77% of those believing that the Bible is the literal word of God, 72% of Protestant fundamentalists, and 51% of males.
Other groups in which a majority believes that gay sex is always wrong include: 52% of male Democrats, 60% of male Republicans, and 63% of African Americans, including 58% of African-American females
It is also maybe worthwhile to remember that in addition to his sophisticated musings on sexuality, the duck guy effectively endorsed racial segregation and Jim Crow. Now this is nothing more than a blatant attempt to link the drive for queer rights to the blacks struggles for their civil rights.  By invoking the lynching of a black 16-year-old, Freddie Moore, in Labadieville, Louisiana  on Monday, Oct. 9, 1933, there are trying to draw an equivalence with their inability to get married any place they deem proper.   Well it just won't wash. This attitude far outweighs the one Pareene impliesin spite of their great effort to sell the idea,
It is actually the case that there are a lot of potential and actual problems with a system in which employees can be punished by their bosses for the expression of certain beliefs outside the workplace. But just as celebrities don’t have the same reasonable expectation of privacy that normal civilians are supposed to enjoy under the law, they also can’t expect the same freedom to express unpopular or controversial opinions without fear of economic reprisal. [Seems to me that Phill's opinion is not near as unpopular as both Pareene and Gurney had hoped that it would be.  The only one, as far as I can tell, who think his expression of his beliefs are controversial are GLLAD and LGBT supporters.] I mean, if your wealth and status depend on appealing to the broadest swath of Americans possible, most people would tell you to avoid controversy. (It is obviously also possible to have famethat depends on the generation of controversy, and it seems like the duck people might switch over to that line of work sooner or later.)  [Obviouly the Duck People do not need GLLAD and LGBT supporters, and in spite of their attempt to ridicule their beliefs their popularity has only increased.]
But let’s think about these duck guys, this Robertson family with the television show that millions of people watch. Maybe this is the north enforcing its cultural hegemony at the expense of an innocent southern man, tarred as a bigot and kicked off his own television show just for saying what he thinks. But if you are southern, maybe you should think some more about the Robertsons and their television show and what message it sends to the rest of the country.  [There is no doubt in my mind that they are sending the correct message to the rest of the county, consider this:  In their State of the Bible in 2013 report, the American Bible Society reveals an overwhelming majority of Americans own and believe what the Bible says. Eighty-eight percent own a Bible, Eighty percent say the Bible is sacred and 61 percent wished they read it more. Pareene, GLLAD and LGBT should consider getting in step with the rest of Americans instead of trying to make everyone believe that they have the only true light.]
The Robertson family is a gang of college-educated millionaires pretending to be backwoods hillbillies. [Neglecting to tell you that it was the success of their duck call, which works,  else  so many would not have bought them to make themmillionaires]  The beards and camo are literally costumes. [So what?] Before they had a television show they were clean-shaven yuppies in polo shirts and cargo shorts.  [When they got the money to do what that wanted to do, they did what they wanted to do.] The Robertsons are performing a pantomime of southernness, and it is making them even richer than they were before. They are performing for a nationwide audience that is probably not mostly southern, and that is definitely not mostly rural and southern. No one on reality television — especially in this era, when it’s more staged than ever — is being their authentic self. [I do not know the truth of that one way or the other.] That’s not in and of itself a problem; entertainment is entertainment. But the Duck Dynasty guys are essentially doing a hillbilly minstrel act[As I recall minstrel act were a very popular entertainment.], filmed and aired by a network jointly owned by the Hearst Corporation and Disney. Maybe that doesn’t offend you. But for much of America, these people are the most prominent modern representatives of white southernness, and the duck guy just confirmed for them the stereotype that white southerners are bible-thumping bigots with twisted racist delusions.  [I know of no one who has to watch them, I have never seen an episode, not my cup of tea, but my neagbhor Frank, two houses down, does not miss a showing, even the reruns.  He would love nothing better than to have the money to live his life in the same manner, but he has not built the better duck call that has the world beating a path to his door, so he lives it vascurly through “Duck Dynasty”.
What I think is that when Scott Gurney created  ‘Duck Dynasty’ it was with the intent to have American laughing at the clowns’, Bible thumping, rednecks as fools worthy of condemnation.  Then when it became obvious that was not going to happen.  They were laughing because they found their antics funny, and in many ways identified with them and their expressed religious beliefs.  That is why, imo, that he let them go to GQ for the interview, and get the show, which is not doing his cause any good, kicked off the are inspite of how much money it is making for A&E.
Pajama guy represents the death of masculinity in the Obama era plus he is gay lol
What is even wrong with you that you are so obsessed with a stock photo model. He is a guy in a stock photo. Get over it.
Wear pajamas. Drink hot chocolate. Talk about getting health insurance. #GetTalking.”  
That sound like a call to arguing politics over the holidays to me if there ever was one.
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of “The Rude Guide to Mitt.” Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Jeremiah 10 and Christmas Trees

There are those , like The Ed Show  guest hostist  MSNBC contributor Joy Reid, who kicked off the show discussing Duck Dynastyn, who interpret Jeremiah 10 as an injunction against using Christmas trees as we celebrate the birth of our Lord. 

On the Ed Show last Monday, 12/16/13,  Reid started the segment saying that the Bible can be manipulated to support any argument. She admitted that the Bible views the act of homosexual activity as a "sin" but also said, in her opinion, that the Bible is also anti-Christmas trees. Reid used Jeremiah 10:10 for her "The Bible is against Christmas trees" argument, which she read before showing a clip of Phil Robertson cutting a Christmas tree in a scene from the A&E show.  Now let us consider her argument, which she did not  make bty, she just asserted it was so.  Reid started the segment saying that the Bible can be manipulated to support any argument.

Verses 8 and 9 speak of "worthless wooden idols" on which workmen place hammered silver and gold, and rich apparel. When we consider that these verses condemn idolatry, we can understand what Jeremiah meant when he said "the customs of the peoples are worthless" in verse 3. No wonder he tells us not to "learn the way of the nations" in verse 2.

Jeremiah is not condemning Christmas trees. He is condemning idolatry. The trees in Jeremiah 10 are cut down to carve them into worthless idols that will later be decorated with gold and silver. Jeremiah says nothing about Christmas trees. That custom originated in northern Europe, not in ancient Judea.

Below are the first 10 verses of Jeremiah Chapter 10.

Jeremiah 10:1-10
King James Version (KJV)
"Hear ye the word which the Lord speaketh unto you, O house of Israel: Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.  Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O Lord; thou art great, and thy name is great in might. Who would not fear thee, O King of nations? for to thee doth it appertain: forasmuch as among all the wise men of the nations, and in all their kingdoms, there is none like unto thee. But they are altogether brutish and foolish: the stock is a doctrine of vanities.  Silver spread into plates is brought from Tarshish, and gold from Uphaz, the work of the workman, and of the hands of the founder: blue and purple is their clothing: they are all the work of cunning men.  But the Lord is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation."

Monday, December 23, 2013

If you live by the tweet you will most assuredly can die by the tweet.




What did Kirt do to piss her off so bad that she wants him never to work again?   He he said things of which she and her Progressive attack machine do not approve.





She had this to say:
“Words cannot express how sorry I am, and how necessary it is for me to apologize to the people of South Africa, who I have offended due to a needless and careless tweet. There is an AIDS crisis taking place in this country, that we read about in America, but do not live with or face on a continuous basis. Unfortunately, it is terribly easy to be cavalier about an epidemic that one has never witnessed firsthand.

 She was a PR executive for the Internet giant InterActive Corp., which owns popular websites like Match.com, Dictionary.com, and Vimeo.  Wonder if they take her advice and never let her work again?

No such luck I fear for the Progressives do not tolerate dissent, nor do they tolerate diversity of opinion, nor do they allow anyone to say or think anything out loud (as  Justine Sacco  has just found out) that is not their canon. And as Phil Robertson learned, even stating belief in the basic tenants of Christianity will bring swift and certain retribution from the  Progressives cultural inquisition.  


If you live by the tweet you will most assuredly can die by the tweet.
(Metaphorically)

Gay Bullying Statistics

It has been pointed out to me that queer kids are 3 to 4 times more likely to be bullied, so in an hour or so I found these stats.  Now if it is true that in 2012 43% of all kids fear harassment in the bathroom at school, that is near half of all students who get bullied in the bathrooms.  If the percentage of queer kids mirror the percentage of queer adults think they are about 3-4 percent tops of the school population.  “Surveys show a shockingly high fraction think a quarter of the country is gay or lesbian, when the reality is that it's probably less than 2 percent.”  Americans Have No Idea How Few Gay People There Are

So if the queers are even 5 times more likely to get bullied, how many kids can that be?  If 282,000 students are physically attacked in secondary schools each month (stats below), and we allow their being 5% of the school population, then about 14,000 will be queer.  How many because they are fat?  Because they are skinny, ugly, shy, new to the school, were loners, I could go on but you get the picture. 

(Health.com) – “Children in Grades 3 through 6 who are obese are more likely to be bullied than their normal-weight peers, a new study has found.” They don’t give a percentage but I am sure that there are more fat kids being bullied than queer kids by far.  

Now do not misconstrue what I am saying, by no means am I saying it is alright to bully queer kids just because more fat kids are bullied or that it is alright to bully fat kids.  What I am saying is that this claim, for which there are no statistics available, come from studied run by gay activist like GLLAD and LGBT organizations and report that of the queer kids they have talked to self report having been bullied at this rate.

The studies I have been able to find does not tell how the study group was picked, the questions asked, them method taking the survey, i.e., telephone (land line or cell, or both), in person with a questioner.  How they determined if the respondent was straight or queer.  Here is an example that I have been pointed to:  Gay Bullying Statistics 


In any case below Are the stats that I have been able to uncover going back to 2001.  In some years they cannot agree upon the percentage being bullied:


2013 Unable to find any stats.

2012
RECENT STATISTICS SHOW THAT:
1 out of 4 kids is Bullied.  1 out of 5 kids admits to being a bully, or doing some "Bullying."  8% of students miss 1 day of class per month for fear of Bullies. 43% fear harassment in the bathroom at school.  282,000 students are physically attacked in secondary schools each month.  More youth violence occurs on school grounds as opposed to on the way to school.  80% of the time, an argument with a bully will end up in a physical fight.  1/3 of students surveyed said they heard another student threaten to kill someone.  Playground statistics - Every 7 minutes a child is bullied. Adult intervention - 4%. Peer intervention - 11%. No intervention - 85%.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 11:39 Written by Nevada PEP Tuesday, 28 February 2012 11:56 77% of students reported being bullied on school property

Nearly 1 in 3 students (27.8%) report being bullied during the school year (National Center for Educational Statistics, 2013).  pacer.org
In a 2011 nationwide survey, 20% of high school students reported being bullied on school property in the 12 months preceding the survey.  An estimated 16% of high school students reported in 2011 that they were bullied electronically in the 12 months before the survey.

Source: National Education Association 2011
- American schools harbor approximately 2.1 million bullies and 2.7 million of their victims. Dan Olweus, National School Safety Center. - 1 in 7 students in Grades K-12 is either a bully or a victim of bullying.

Bullying statistics 2010: New bullying statistics for 2010 revealed about one in seven students in grades kindergarten through 12th grade is either a bully or has been a victim of bullying.   (14%)  Another pole for the same year washingtonpost.com reports:  New data on bullying released today show that 17 percent of American students report being bullied two to three times a month or more within a school semester, with girls and boys having similar rates.

About a quarter of high school students were bullied at least once during the 2008-2009 school year, and about 7 percent were bullied online by other students, according to new data released Monday by the National Center for Education Statistics.
I could find no stats in-between these years.  This study came up many many more times than any other because so many other people cited it.

STATS 2001: SELECTED SCHOOL VIOLENCE RESEARCH FINDINGS FROM 2001 SOURCES


1 out of 4 kids is Bullied.  The American Justice Department says that this month 1 out of every 4 kids will be abused by another youth.  Surveys Show That  77%  of students are bullied mentally, verbally, & physically.  And According to a 2001 national survey of parents and kids by the Kaiser Family Foundation and Nickelodeon, 74 percent of eight- to 11-year-old students said teasing and bullying regularly occur at their schools, while only about half of parents in this survey saw bullying as a problem for their children.