Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Captain American And Government Hit List

I just read, 4/16/14, Ron Paul's nonprofit Campaign for Liberty will fight the Internal Revenue Service's demand that it reveal its donor list to the agency, despite having already been fined for refusing to do so.  Ron Paulgroup to defy IRS

This brought to mind several things:


Have you had the occasion to see the new Captain American movie: The Winter Soldier?  Well, in the story  S.H.I.E.L.D. (Read Homeland Security) had been infiltrated by a nefarious group called Hydry (read Fabian Progressives).  Hydra’s overwhelming desire is to bring peace and order to the world with a one world government with no dissenters to the type of rule they wished to impose upon the world.  Their plan was three fold:

First to infiltrate and take over Homeland Security, after the takeover to build serpentisuly a fleet of airships (reads Drones) that were heavily armed with extremely accurate long range guns that could target individual from high in the sky, and were nuclear powered so they never had to land, they would be resupplied by planes with ammunition and food.

Second was to obtain a list and location of all the people world wide who oppose and act against their taking over of the world and imposing the ridiged class division that their idea of order demanded.

Third was the implantation of their assume world dominance by killing Captain American (read, We The People) and all those in Homeland Security who had not been recruited to Hydra because they were believed to be incorruptible by the rewards Hydra offered.  And when they were out of the way to launch the airships, train their guns on all of those they felt would not go along with their takeover, about half a billion in all, and kill them all. 

The movie ends on a high note with Captain America, We The People, foiled the Hydra’s operation by changing the targeting data of the airships from the dissenters to the airships (Drones) themselves.

Which brings me to the IRS and Ron Paul’s list of donors.  Our government, like Santa Clause,  is composing a list of everyone naughty and nice for the day when SHTF.
Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. As you can see, this list covers most of the country

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation areseparate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. “Anti-Gay”
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Rightwing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians

Think it is a pipe dream?  Do you think that those who went to the Bundy Ranch in Nevada to stop the BLM are not on a list?  Do you think that you are not?  I have no doubt that I am on one.


Thursday, April 3, 2014

4/3/2014

Good morning, as you know by now, another shooting at Fort Hood. This time, it appears, not by a jihadist, but by a mental case. Now we do not know if he went on his shooting spree because he was depressed and just went crazy. Here one thing I doubt that they will yell you, and that is what psychotic drugs he was taking, and point out how many mass shooting shooters have been using them under doctor's orders. And as sure as the rain will fall the Progressives will use this as an excuses to limit all combat troops' legal liability to keep and bare arms.

May the Lord God IAUA bless us with enough this day.

But before I end my morning salutation I would like to say a word about the need for voter ID, and why Progressives are so dead set against it, they cannot win with out cheating. I read yesterday, "N.C. State Board Finds More than 35K Incidents of ‘Double Voting’ in 2012."

"North Carolina’s Board of Elections found that tens of thousands of registered voters from the state have personal information matching that of registered voters in other states, and appear to have voted in states other than North Carolina in 2012. In some cases, votes were cast under names of individuals who had passed away before Election Day. The review searched databases in 27 other states and 101 million voter records for information such as matching names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers." The Corner

Friday, March 28, 2014

More Than 1 In 4 Car Crashes Involve Cellphone Use

I just read,2/28/14, "Survey: More Than 1 In 4 Car Crashes Involve Cellphone Use" My question to you is why we do not hear a progressive hue and cry to ban cellphones? "In 2010, 358 murders were reported involving a rifle while 6,009 were reported involving a handgun; another 1,939 were reported with an unspecified type of firearm.[4]" (Wikipedia)

Compare the above this to when "in 2010, there were an estimated 5,419,000 automobile crashes, killing 32,885 and injuring 2,239,000." (Wikipedia)

If the 1 in 4 relationships to cellphones is true then 559, 750 are injured and 8,221 killed in 2010 related to cellphone use as compared to the 358 murdered with rifles of all types, and the hue and cry is to ban "Assault Rifles" The FBI murder statistics do not differentiate between types of rifles, but consider this. of all the murders in 2012 in America they breaks down like this: 13,636; Hands and Feet 801; Assault Rifles: less than 348. (Free Republic)

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Progressives Hate Voter ID Laws


Vice President Biden said new voter ID laws in North Carolina, Alabama and Texas were evidence of “hatred” and “zealotry” during a Black History Month event at the Naval Observatory on Tuesday.  Biden: New voter ID laws tied to 'hatred.

That being the case, what is the drive to make everyone entering a Federal Building, or Facility, fly on an airplane, or drive an automobile have a Federally approved ID card that can be scanned into their system each time you are required to produce it.  You cannot pick up your prescriptions without showing an approved ID, a VA ID will not cut it.

Why is it that the Progressives see being required to show an ID to vote as racists, but none of the other requirements as race neutral?  They claim that the time and expense of getting an ID to show at the poll puts an undue financial hardship on the poor.  I am sure that there are people like Thelma Mitchell of Nashville, Tenn.  When Thelma Mitchell, a retired state employee, learned that her old employee ID (which was issued by the state and included her photo) wouldn't meet Tennessee's new voter ID law, she went to a motor vehicle office to obtain a valid photo ID. The agency asked her for a birth certificate, but she didn't have one and was denied her request for a new ID.  Mitchell, 93, has never had a birth certificate. She wasn't born in a hospital and was delivered by a midwife, in Alabama in 1918. Birth certificates, particularly for African-Americans in the South, weren't regularly generated at the time. As a result, Mitchell may not be able to vote this year for the first time in decades."I got so mad" about being turned away, Mitchell said in an interview. "I was holding my peace to keep from telling him off. So I didn't get to vote."   Why NewPhoto ID Laws Mean Some Won't Vote


Everything comes with a price, to stop all of those who vote in the dead's place, their old mother or dad, aunt or uncle who does not get out of the house and does not care one way or the other, this may be the price.  It will also stop people from registering under more than one name.   

Beginning in January 2014, there will be 27 states that will require a passport for entry into federal buildings and all commercial flights, no matter their destination. The change stems from the 2005 "Real ID" law, which went into effect in 2008. The bill paved the way for a universal identification system across the country, but several states including Louisiana opted out of the program.  


State Progress (updated 2/7/2014)

Compliant States/Territories: DHS provided a list of 21 states currently found to have met the standards of the REAL ID Act of 2005 for driver’s licenses and identification cards. These states are Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
Extensions: DHS also announced that 21 states/territories—Arkansas, California, District of Columbia, Guam, Idaho, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia and the Virgin Islands—will receive a compliance extension based on their movement toward full compliance. Licenses from these states will be accepted for federal purposes during the extension period. These extensions will expire on Oct. 10, 2014 and can be renewed.
States/Territories not in Compliance: There are 14 states/territories—Alaska, American Samoa, Arizona, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New York[i], Northern Marianas Islands, Oklahoma and Washington[ii]—currently in a noncompliance status. These jurisdictions can be granted an extension in the future if they are deemed to be moving toward full compliance

The following enforcement measures are cumulative, with measures in each phase remaining in effect through successive phases. Each phase will begin with a 3-month period where agencies will provide notice to individuals attempting use driver’s licenses or identification cards from noncompliant states but still allow access. After this period is over, agencies will no longer accept such identification for entry to Federal facilities, and individuals will need to follow the agency’s alternate procedures (to be made available by the agency).

Monday, February 17, 2014

White ON Black Yes! But Never Black ON Back, Nor Black On White

If you have been watching the MSM you cannot help but know that 12 jurors in Florida found 47-year-old Michael Dunn, a white man, convicted of three counts of attempted second-degree murder after an argument over loud music outside of a convenience store, they also found him guilty of shooting into an occupied car.


Fla. Man Guilty of Lesser Counts in ‘Stand Your Ground’ Shooting, Mistrial on First-Degree Murder Charge:


Now compare and contrast that shooting with this one in Arkansas, "Girl, 15, shot dead by man, 48, who opened fire on teens in a blind rage after they dumped leaves and smashed eggs on his car as a prank" The shooter has has been arrested and charged with first-degree murder, but you will not hear the MSM talking about this, you will not find out from then anything about the trail or what the verdict may be, why?

Because the shooter is black as is the girl who was shot, the MSM does not care about black on black crime, they turn a blind eye to the black on white crime such as the knockout game played by black thugs on unsuspecting whites, but let a white kill a black and their day is made. Day hell, it makes their year!


Girl, 15, 'shot dead by man, 48, who opened fire on teens in a blind rage after they dumped leaves and smashed eggs on his car as a prank'

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Ignorant Judge

I reckon that ya'll heard that a federal judge just struck down Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage? Well this judge must have got her education in a government school, for she sure does not know the Constitution that she is suppose to be using to judge the constitutionality of laws passed by legislators.

Judge Allen wrote on the first page of her opinion, "Our Constitution declares that 'all men' are created equal. Surely this means all of us," The Constitution says no such thing, that phrase is found in the Decoration of Independence, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

It also says, "...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

Monday, January 27, 2014

Is Smoking A Scapegoat?

he headline this morning: "Ex-Marlboro Man dies from smoking-related disease..." In the article you read, "Lawson died Jan. 10 at his home in San Luis Obispo of respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD, his wife, Susan Lawson said Sunday." LOS ANGELES (AP) — Eric Lawson, who portrayed the rugged Marlboro man in cigarette ads during the late 1970s, has died. He was 72.  Ex-Marlboroman dies from smoking-related disease.

Average life expectancy for a man in the US born today is 76, for a male born in 1941 it was 63.1 years, so in effect Lawson exceeded his life expectancy by almost 10 years and they are blaming his early demise on smoking:  Life expectancy in the USA, 1900-98

Now here is the thing, they do not know that his COPD was of a result of his being a smoker, for people who have never smoked suffer from it as well, they assume that it was. If it is COPD is a result from smoking then why is there a gender difference? In 2009, more than 70,000 females died compared to almost 64,000 males. Women are about twice as likely to be diagnosed with chronic bronchitis as men. In 2011, 3.3 million men (29.6 per 1,000 populations) had a diagnosis of chronic bronchitis compared to 6.8 million women (56.7 per 1,000 populations).  ChronicObstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fact Sheet.

Granted that the majority of people who subcumbul to COPD were/are smokers, and this is a strong correlation. When they talk about risk factors they are talking about things in common with those who historically have suffered with COPD. Other risk factors of COPD include exposure to air pollution, secondhand smoke and occupational dusts and chemicals, heredity, a history of childhood respiratory infections and socioeconomic status. Ibid

From these I will just select two to point to the weakness of their argument. First, secondhand smoke, The World Health Organization's first study on SHS is a textbook example of the right way to conduct an epidemiological study. Unfortunately for them, it yielded unexpected results. They responded by doing a second one, a meta-analysis that allowed them to extract the results they wanted. The participants consisted of 650 patients with lung cancer and 1542 control subjects. Patients with smoking related diseases were excluded from the control group. None of the subjects in either group had smoked more than 400 cigarettes in their lifetime. On March 8, 1998, the British newspaper The Telegraph reported "The world's leading health organization has withheld from publication a study which shows that not only might there be no link between passive smoking and lung cancer but that it could have even a protective effect."  The WHO Study


Now I would like to turn to of the other risk (correlation) factor they associate with COPD, and that is air pollution.
The first television came into my neighborhood in 1952; I was 9 at the time. In the evening after our chores were done the kids in the nearby houses would all converge in Mr. Harington’s front room, sit on the floor, and watch TV. I remember many of the shows that were presented to us free except for the cost of watching the commercials. There were the Howdy Doddy Show, Ozzie Nelson, Sugerfoot, The Rifleman, The Grand Old Opry, and many more, but we kids had to watch, if we were to watch at all, what the adults decided to watch

We were at the beginning of the Cold War, with a hot war going on in Korea. The government was conducting above ground Atomic Bomb tests out west, and there was a push to make them do the test underground. I remember watching a Talking Head show (they did not call them that then) about the cost of doing above ground testing in human disease due to the radioactive fallout. I remember distinctly someone arguing that the incident of death by lung cancer would increase by a certain percentage do to people breathing in the fallout down wind. Well, guess what, most of the US was downwind from where the test was being done.

In fact, according to the cancer institute, knowing would still help, because most of the 7,000 to 70,000 extra cancers that the radiation may produce have not yet been diagnosed.  Cancer Studyon 50s Bomb Test Is Released

"Earlier this month, the first results of the RPHP health study were released in an article in the International Journal of Health Services. Baby teeth of St. Louis baby boomers who died of cancer by age 50 had more than double -- 122 percent more -- the Sr-90 concentration than did Boomers who are alive and healthy. This research, known as a case-control study, is the first evidence that bomb tests harmed Americans using actual levels of fallout in human bodies. It is not yet possible to estimate the number of cancer victims from fallout, but it appears that the CDC estimate of 15,000 deaths is too low." The hugemushroom clouds from atom bomb tests of the 1950s and 1960s are anunforgettable part of the American saga.

Here is the point I am making, while the government’s CDC slants their report to make it seem like smoking is all by itself responsible for that vast majority of incidents of COPD while in fact it could just as well be the combination of breathing in the fallout on top of smoking that is causing the increase in lung cancer. In 1940 11% or a rate of 120.1 per 100,000 of all deaths were attributed to cancer, in 1950 it was only 14%, but by 1975 this has risen to 23% or a rate or 268.2 per 100,000 deaths. Almost everyone smoked from 1930-40 until the big push to make it unacceptable by blaming all lung cancer on it.  LeadingCauses of Death, 1900-1998

In my opinion the government does not want to accept the responsibility for poisoning the air with fallout and has found a convenient scapegoat.