Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Blizzard of 2015

From the Global Warming Hype Department:


Good morning to a cold, 28`, winter morn, it looks like New York City dodged the bullet, well the “Extreme Weather” blizzard of 2015 in any case, but the rest of those Yankees north of them are still getting buried in the white stuff. As predicted the Progressives are blaming this on Global Warming, last night, 1/16/15, on MSNBC’s The Ed Schultz Show Ed had as a guest a meteorologist, whose name escapes me, that was blaming the expected snow on the “unprecedented” heat in the ocean allowing the storm to draw more water for it to convert to snow to dump in this “Historic” storm.
figure-114
He, the meteorologist, mention no studies or other proof that his claim was true, but when you are preaching to the choir you do not need proof. but I am not even in that congregation let along the choir, so I looked to see if his claim could be verified and found this chart of oceans temperature changes since 2003 that shows that the North Atlantic has only been warming at a rate of .007 degrees celsius per century. He, the meteorologist, syre did not let the truth get in the way of a good story about ham man is causing all of this “Extreme Weather” by dumping so much co2 in the atmosphere, which is truly a pitiful when compared to all the co2 put in the air by Mother Nature as this graph illustrates.

human-global-warming

“Extreme Weather” a relatively new buzz word, this is the last year was when I notice it being in common use in the MSM to describe weather events, as I explained in this post,  Control the Language, Control the Debate.  The use of the term “Extreme Weather” is intended to invoke Global Warming in the mind of the hearer. Global Warming is used to imply man made global warming, all with the intent to grow acceptance  in the mind of the population that they must change the way they use energy, pay more taxes, reduces traveling, pay more taxes, use green energy, Pay more taxes to save the earth. It is brainwashing pure and simple in its simplest form.

No comments: